There are few things more painful than making an application for an invention idea that someone has already published. But, there are patent search services that help the inventor realize this fact even before they make their application. This guide highlights how professionals assess inventions and what determines the patentability of an invention.
An experienced analyst undergoes a certain procedure before filing the patent application. In the current case, this analysis focuses on the novelty of the invention in comparison with previous disclosures.
Analysts search through all granted patents and publications for solutions that have been found before. The reason behind this is that a record number of 201,974 patent applications were received by the European Patent Office in 2025. Thus, an analysis prevents any duplication.
Prior art search services comb through patents and non-patent documents such as journals, standards, and product brochures. Experts analyze various documents in many languages since the most relevant document could well be in another country. The result is that you get to know about past inventions before they undergo examination.
Patent search services compare all of the elements of your invention to the references they have uncovered. Then, a written patentability analysis gives an estimate of whether the key concept meets the threshold of novelty. In other words, you will get a direct response no matter what.
Some standard tests that patent office’s use around the world for all applications are available. This is why those inventors who know about them are able to make better applications.
An invention is different from anything else known to the public or in public sales. Experts match every feature to identify at least one element that has not been disclosed in any previous document. This unique element may eventually become the basis of the claim.
A patentable invention should have an inventive step that is not considered obvious by the person skilled in the field. This criterion is tested through a combination of references to see if the outcome is natural. For instance, combining elements to produce an expected result rarely works.
Search results provide the inventor with the information that is needed prior to filing, selling, or disclosing his invention. For example, one can sell his or her idea without a patent; however, the public sale will affect the inventor’s filing rights.
Initial searches alert you to blocking documents prior to any investment in writing and filing costs. The analysis may reveal the fact that your competitor is already patenting the technical space. Consequently, this allows you to stop, redesign, or refocus your efforts.
Search results indicate the claim that has the most similar references disclosed before. The drafters make changes to the claims so that they cover everything except what was invented previously but still retain commercial value. For this reason, the final application withstands licensing negotiations and enforcement better.
In conclusion, extensive pre-inventive research reveals past inventions, assesses novelty and inventiveness, and finds any overlapping claims. This information is valuable in helping inventors file better applications, save money from being wasted, and make informed decisions before each filing.